Forty Minutes With Nowhere to Be: The Commute Before the Smartphone Colonized It
Before the phone became a portal, the daily commute was a strange kind of freedom — enforced downtime that belonged to no one and nothing. You stared out the window, read a paperback, let your mind drift. That version of the commute is largely gone now, and its disappearance has cost us more than we've acknowledged.
Consider what the morning commute looked like in, say, 1987. You're on the Chicago L, heading downtown. The car is full but quiet in the way that crowded spaces sometimes are. Someone across from you is working through the Tribune. The guy by the door has his eyes closed — not sleeping, just somewhere else. A woman in the back is halfway through a fat paperback, the spine cracked from weeks of use. Nobody is performing anything for anyone. The forty minutes between home and office belong entirely to themselves.
That scene, unremarkable at the time, now reads almost like science fiction.
The Commute as Unstructured Time
For most of the twentieth century, commuting was dead time in the most literal sense — time that couldn't be used for anything productive, at least not efficiently. And for many people, that was quietly fine. The commute functioned as a decompression chamber. You left the house behind and arrived at the office already settled. On the way home, you processed the day before you walked through the front door.
Psychologists have a name for the mental state this kind of unstructured time tends to produce: default mode. It's what happens when the brain isn't actively tasked with anything — a state associated with creativity, emotional processing, memory consolidation, and the kind of loose, associative thinking that produces unexpected insights. The morning commute, for all its tedium, was a reliable daily window into that state.
People read on trains and buses, and that reading was different from the reading we do now. A commuter working through a novel in 1985 was engaged with a single object for thirty or forty uninterrupted minutes, every day. That kind of sustained attention — the ability to stay inside one thing without checking anything else — was unremarkable then. It would be considered a significant personal achievement now.
Drivers had their own version of this. Before GPS navigation delivered turn-by-turn instructions in a calm synthetic voice, driving required actual spatial memory. You knew your route because you'd learned it. Traffic jams were managed with the radio and patience. The car was a sealed environment — no notifications, no messages, no ambient pull of the internet. Just you, the road, and whatever was on AM radio.
Then the Phone Arrived
The smartphone didn't immediately colonize the commute. The first iPhone launched in 2007, but the full transformation took a few years to settle. By 2012 or so, it was largely complete. The commute had been converted from unstructured time into productive time — or at least, time that felt productive.
Email on the train. Podcasts in the car. Slack notifications at a red light. Social media during the walk from the parking garage. The commute, which had previously resisted being useful, was now fully integrated into the work and entertainment ecosystem. Dead time had been eliminated. Efficiency had been achieved.
Except it hadn't, really. What had actually happened was that the commute had been annexed — not by productivity, but by the constant low-grade demand to engage with something. Research from the University of Sussex found that commuters who read or engaged in mindful activity during their journey reported significantly lower stress than those who spent the same time on social media or work email. The commute that felt productive was often the one doing the most damage.
What We Actually Lost
The loss isn't romantic or abstract. It's measurable in specific ways.
Attention spans have shortened in ways that researchers are still trying to fully document, but the trend lines are consistent. The ability to sit with a single sustained thought — to follow an idea from beginning to end without interruption — has become genuinely harder for many people. The commute used to train that capacity daily, without anyone thinking of it as training.
Creativity has also taken a quiet hit. Boredom, it turns out, is generative. Studies have shown that people who are allowed to be bored before a creative task outperform those who were entertained. The brain, left without stimulation, goes looking for its own — and that search produces ideas. The commuter staring out the window at the passing suburbs wasn't wasting time. They were, in some real sense, thinking.
And then there's the simple matter of transition. The commute once served as a buffer between roles — between being a parent and being an employee, between being an employee and being a partner. That buffer has been eroded. Work follows people home now, in part because the commute no longer serves as a natural break. The phone bridges the gap that the train window used to fill.
The Irony of the Noise-Canceling Headphones
There's something telling about the popularity of noise-canceling headphones on public transit. The technology is sold as a way to create personal space in a crowded environment — to carve out a bubble of focus or relaxation. But what most people do inside that bubble is fill it with content. Podcasts. Music. Audiobooks. Streaming video on the phone.
The headphones cancel the external noise and replace it with internal noise. The silence they create is immediately occupied. True quiet — the kind that existed on the commute before the phone arrived — isn't something most people choose anymore. It feels uncomfortable, like a problem to be solved.
A handful of commuters still read actual books on trains. You notice them now in a way you wouldn't have in 1990, because they stand out. They look, somehow, deliberately analog — as if they've made a choice rather than simply following a habit.
The Window Is Still There
Here's what's strange: the commute hasn't changed physically. The train still runs the same route. The traffic is still the same traffic. The forty minutes between home and office still exists. The window is still there.
What's changed is our relationship to that time — our willingness to let it be empty, to let the mind do what it does when it's left alone. We've decided, collectively and mostly without discussion, that unoccupied time is a problem. That the commute is a resource to be optimized rather than a passage to be experienced.
The person staring out the train window in 1987 wasn't doing nothing. They were doing something we've largely forgotten how to name — something between thinking and not thinking, between presence and drift.
We traded it for a notification feed. And most days, we don't even notice it's gone.